From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun May 13 9:31:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from arena.delfi.lv (mail.parks.lv [195.2.96.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11FE37B422 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 09:31:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from omega_@navigators.lv) Received: from uran ([62.85.10.171]) by arena.delfi.lv (8.9.3/8.9.1/OL.cf-3.1) with SMTP id TAA27291 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 19:31:00 +0300 Message-ID: <000801c0dbcd$74d57a20$ab0a553e@delfi.lv> From: "Aleksander Kamenskih" To: Subject: bin files Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 19:55:02 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0DBE6.995947A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0DBE6.995947A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Can I run binary files under FreeBSD? ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0DBE6.995947A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

Can I run binary files under = FreeBSD?

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0DBE6.995947A0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon May 14 4:28: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4264337B424 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 04:27:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA34402; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:27:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Aleksander Kamenskih" Cc: Subject: Re: bin files References: <000801c0dbcd$74d57a20$ab0a553e@delfi.lv> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 14 May 2001 13:27:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <000801c0dbcd$74d57a20$ab0a553e@delfi.lv> Message-ID: Lines: 8 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Aleksander Kamenskih" writes: > Can I run binary files under FreeBSD? Yes. DES (ask a stupid question...) -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon May 14 9:51:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from scotth.emsphone.com (scotth.emsphone.com [199.67.51.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B92337B423; Mon, 14 May 2001 09:51:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shildret@scotth.emsphone.com) Received: (from shildret@localhost) by scotth.emsphone.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f4EGpP528424; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:51:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from shildret) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1383486627.20010512133520@Chg.RU> Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 11:51:25 -0500 (CDT) From: "Scott T. Hildreth" To: =?koi8-r?B?5M3J1NLJyiDzydfB3sXOy88=?= Subject: RE: Oracle for Linux client libraries Cc: marcel@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yes, ...Linux gcc, you get it by installing Linux_Devel port. I run the RH5.2 libraries with Oracle 8.0.5,(requires no compat libraries). I have compiled ProC & DBD::Oracle. I cannot get the gdb to work, it won't stop at break point. I believe it is a ptrace error, but I haven't put to much time into tracing down the problem. STH On 12-May-01 Дмитрий Сиваченко wrote: > Hello! > > Imagine that I installed Oracle 8 for Linux, as described in the > FreeBSD handbook. Can I then write programs that use Oracle client > libraries? Which compiler should I use, native FreeBSD gcc or linux > gcc installed with linux_base port? Which libraries should I link > against? > > Thank you in advance, > Dima. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Scott T. Hildreth Date: 14-May-01 Time: 11:46:52 ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon May 14 10:59:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8411037B423; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:59:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@cup.hp.com) Received: from adlmail.cup.hp.com (adlmail.cup.hp.com [15.0.100.30]) by palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE8517AB; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gauss.cup.hp.com (gauss.cup.hp.com [15.28.97.152]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP id KAA17750; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by gauss.cup.hp.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f4EHxA462193; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:59:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:58:50 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Dmitrij Sivacenko Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, marcel@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oracle for Linux client libraries Message-ID: <20010514105850.A62170@gauss.cup.hp.com> References: <1383486627.20010512133520@Chg.RU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1383486627.20010512133520@Chg.RU>; from dima@Chg.RU on Sat, May 12, 2001 at 01:35:20PM +0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 01:35:20PM +0400, Dmitrij Sivacenko wrote: > > Imagine that I installed Oracle 8 for Linux, as described in the > FreeBSD handbook. Can I then write programs that use Oracle client > libraries? Yes, provided that... > Which compiler should I use, native FreeBSD gcc or linux > gcc installed with linux_base port? ...you use a Linux compiler. The linux_base port does not install a compiler. Install the linux_devtools port for that. > Which libraries should I link > against? Hey, you're the developer! (ie Linux libraries :-) HTH, -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed May 16 8:34:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (fac13.ds.psu.edu [146.186.61.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D2D37B422 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 08:34:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4GFYUf23676 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:34:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200105161534.f4GFYUf23676@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: looking for vmware fm's From: "Richard E. Hawkins" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:34:30 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've managed to install vmware and get it to execute debian from its own partition, but have a few steps to go. I'm sure most of this is rtfm level, but I can't find much in the way of fm's . . . the page and freebsdzine.org helped, but I don't know enough about networking to get the rest of the way. I currently have a debian file of /etc/networks/interfaces showing: This is enough to telnet back and forth between freebsd and linux, and if I manually type in the xauth codes, I can run an X application on my freebsd display. What I need out of vmware is to be able to run an X based debugger for my linux fortran compiler--the compilers work under FreeBSD linux emulation, as does the generated code, but the debuggers fail. Ideally, I could set up a command that would ssh into the virtual linux machine, which would in some way mount my regular /home (nfs? I note that it happily mounts the live ufs filesystem, but I presume that this is a Bad Idea (tm). And it is painfully slow. There are a slew of error messages of the type May 16 11:22:11 fac13 /kernel: /dev/vmmon: Vmx86_DestroyVM: unlocked pages: 119431, unlocked dirty pages: 83256 This is a P3/850, but the performance withing vmware is much slower than on the 200mhz pentium it replaced. hawk -- Prof. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed May 16 11:14:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE06237B423; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:14:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Received: from klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (Sturm@klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4GIEEn14128; Wed, 16 May 2001 20:14:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 20:14:14 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hartmann, O." To: Cc: Subject: Fortran problems/Linux emu problems Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear Sirs. We run several server systems under FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE using several Linux Fortran F90 and F95 compilers. We tried VAST F90 and Lahey/Fujitsu LF95 V5.5. We need NCAR graphics for research and education purposes and we run into several problems. First I will explain what happens when installing NACRG-4.2.1-PC_LINUX (g77 precompiled binaries). Linux_base and Linux_devtools are properly installed. Installation of precompiled Linux binaries NCARG-4.2.1-PC_LINUX works well, after editing config/env.LINUX_PC. We also compiled NCARG 4.2.2 from source by switching '/compat/linux/bin/sh -l' into a Linux environment and compiling the sources with the appropriate compiler. VAST F90: After installing VAST F90 we tried to compile several software suits. NCARG 4.2.2 is not compiling well with vf90 since several portions of the suite are dropping into errors. Using ncarg 4.2.1-LINUX precompiled from NCAR: Another self made software, using ncarg extensively, works well with vf90. The program calculates several trajectories and produces graphical output, using IDT. Result: source compiles, result with idt viewable. Trying to compile this little program works, but execution of the program results in an error: program iotest write (11,'(B)') 'Hello World!' end program iotest This happens also after brandelf'ing the compiled 'hello'. The error is: startio: error in format apparent state: unit 11 named fort.11 last format: (b) lately writing sequential formatted external IO Abort trap (core dumped) Lahey/Fujitsu LF95: Installation of Lahey/Fujitsu LF95 works fine and all things seems to be clear after brandelfing the whole bin directory. Compiling NCARG 4.2.2 works well, almost all programs get compiled and installed. Compiling the same numerical application as above with f90 now with lf95 and ncarg 4.2.2 results in strange code. Compilation works, but when calling idt to sho the result shows an idt-error: reading stdout of translator: Illegal seek Translator aborted Nothing is shown in idt. Then I switch over to nacrg-4.2.1 precompiled binaries. The sources nveer compile the right way, I get a lot of unreferenced call errors like this: lf95 -O pvinv.f90 -I/homes/vwirth/lib -L/homes/vwirth/lib -lvwplot -L/usr/local/ncarg/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lncarg -lncarg_gks -lncarg_c -lX11 Compiling file pvinv.f90. Compiling program unit pvinv at line 1: /usr/local/ncarg/lib/libncarg.a(agsetc.o): In function `agsetc_': agsetc.o(.text+0x13d): undefined reference to `s_cmp' /usr/local/ncarg/lib/libncarg.a(agsetp.o): In function `agsetp_': agsetp.o(.text+0x4d4): undefined reference to `s_cmp' /usr/local/ncarg/lib/libncarg.a(gridal.o): In function `gridal_': gridal.o(.text+0x3af): undefined reference to `r_lg10' gridal.o(.text+0x4b7): undefined reference to `r_lg10' gridal.o(.text+0xc43): undefined reference to `r_lg10' gridal.o(.text+0x102e): undefined reference to `s_copy' gridal.o(.text+0x1280): undefined reference to `r_lg10' gridal.o(.text+0x16ff): undefined reference to `s_copy' gridal.o(.text+0x1a73): undefined reference to `r_lg10' gridal.o(.text+0x1d70): undefined reference to `r_lg10' gridal.o(.text+0x231e): undefined reference to `s_wsfi' gridal.o(.text+0x2334): undefined reference to `do_fio' gridal.o(.text+0x233c): undefined reference to `e_wsfi' gridal.o(.text+0x23c2): undefined reference to `s_wsfi' gridal.o(.text+0x23d8): undefined reference to `do_fio' gridal.o(.text+0x23e0): undefined reference to `e_wsfi' gridal.o(.text+0x2690): undefined reference to `r_lg10' gridal.o(.text+0x26ca): undefined reference to `r_lg10' gridal.o(.text+0x270f): undefined reference to `r_lg10' gridal.o(.text+0x2749): undefined reference to `r_lg10' /usr/local/ncarg/lib/libncarg.a(plchhq.o): In function `plchhq_': and so on And another obscure thing happens: program iotest write (11,'(B)') 'Hello World!' end program iotest does not work as it should be! It results in this error: An I/O error was detected (c library=getcwd, unit=11). It is standard code, but why isn't it working? It is hard to me to explain the right way to understand all things some Gurus need to know, but I hope I gave enough informations to make some hints. Due the fact VAST F90 isn't capable to compile 'Numerical Recipes' and a lot of other F90 type Fortran stuff, we would like to use Lahey/Fujitsu lf95 Fortran. Many programs, suites and self made software compiles under lf95. But what's up with the ncarg libs? When compiling under Linux-emulation with Linux compilers the result is inoperable, i think there is a problem with the X11-stuff but I have no time to figure out. Using the Linux precompiled version 4.2.1 of NCARG lf95 results in a bunch of unreferenced call errors as shown above. These errors are well known when essential libs couldn't be linked properly, but I have no glue how to check why lf95 is not capable linking existing libraries. compiling the same suite with the same Linux precompiles of ncarg 4.2.1 with VAST F90 works well ... IF YOU HAVE A HINT, PLEASE, PLEASE let me know it! I appreciate everything you want to donate ... Thanks ... Oliver -- MfG O. Hartmann ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de ---------------------------------------------------------------- IT-Administration des Institut fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinensaal) Tel: +496131/3924144 FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri May 18 9:50:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A6D37B424; Fri, 18 May 2001 09:50:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Received: from klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (Sturm@klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4IGnxn45990; Fri, 18 May 2001 18:49:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 18:49:59 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hartmann, O." To: Cc: Subject: Strange Linux emulation behaviour ... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear Sirs. I posted this question priorly to this mailing-lists but the problem couldn't be solved since then. We use on several UNIX boxes running FreeBSD 4.3 STABLE as cvsupdated 5 days ago. Additionaly, we use Lahey's LF95 Fortran compiler for Linux. Since the last cvsupdate on all machines the Fortran compiler worked well. We did our last cvsupdate bevor the last one about 20 days ago. Compiling a simple hello world works well. Then, when starting the program once, it produces output as expected. But calling it a second time gives me this: An I/O error was detected (c library=getcwd, unit=10) Sourcecode: PROGRAM IOTEST OPEN (unit=10, file='io.out', status='new') WRITE (10,1) 'Hello World!' 1 FORMAT (a) CLOSE (10) END PROGRAM IOTEST It is strange: I changed current directory and rechanged back to the little program's working directory and called it again - and it worked, for onne call only! Then doing cd again and re-cd into the working dir. What's going on? -- MfG O. Hartmann ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de ---------------------------------------------------------------- IT-Administration des Institut fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinensaal) Tel: +496131/3924144 FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri May 18 18:35:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net (maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B1C37B424 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 18:35:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vsilyaev@mindspring.com) Received: from delta.rc.ny.us (nyf-ny2-30.ix.netcom.com [198.211.16.94]) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA08994; Fri, 18 May 2001 21:35:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from vsilyaev@localhost) by delta.rc.ny.us (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f4J1Zat00326; Fri, 18 May 2001 21:35:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from vsilyaev) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:35:35 -0400 From: Vladimir Silyaev To: ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re:Fortran problems/Linux emu problems Message-ID: <20010518213535.A306@delta.rc.ny.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org You should doublecheck that your linux executabled are linked against Linux libraries, not FreeBSD ones. You may check that by using ldd from the linux devtools. Another thing what you may try to do, it's to compile from environment 'chrooted' into the /compat/linux. -- Regards, Vladimir To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri May 18 18:39:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net (hall.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502A137B422 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 18:39:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vsilyaev@mindspring.com) Received: from delta.rc.ny.us (nyf-ny2-30.ix.netcom.com [198.211.16.94]) by hall.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA15285; Fri, 18 May 2001 21:39:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from vsilyaev@localhost) by delta.rc.ny.us (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f4J1des00346; Fri, 18 May 2001 21:39:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from vsilyaev) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:39:40 -0400 From: Vladimir Silyaev To: dochawk@psu.edu Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: looking for vmware fm's Message-ID: <20010518213940.A329@delta.rc.ny.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yeah, vmware suppose to be slower that original computer - especially it much slower that a lot of I/O and/or interrupts/exceptions occured. You may try to mount live UFS, but as R/O, it should be safe enough, and most likely than to mount nfs'ed drive. -- Vladimir To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat May 19 7:12:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7C837B424 for ; Sat, 19 May 2001 07:12:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Received: from klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (Sturm@klima.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.162]) by klima.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4JECWn56730; Sat, 19 May 2001 16:12:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 16:12:32 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hartmann, O." To: Vladimir Silyaev Cc: Subject: Re:Fortran problems/Linux emu problems In-Reply-To: <20010518213535.A306@delta.rc.ny.us> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 18 May 2001, Vladimir Silyaev wrote: Hello. Well, I did the 'doublecheck' so far, without success. I tried to 'chroot' myself into /compat/linux and encapsulate all actions by starting a Linux shell by exec-ing a /compat/linux/bin/sh, without success. But why should I do that when I know that all systems run all right before? Using ldd within this encapsulated environment gives me an error like this: root: /bin: ldd dd /usr/bin/ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: cannot execute binary file ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (126) This is the Linux dd. All programs are compiled against Linux ones, I presume. It is curois to me that some systems are not working properly since we did the last update. :>You should doublecheck that your linux executabled are linked against :>Linux libraries, not FreeBSD ones. You may check that by using ldd from the :>linux devtools. :> :>Another thing what you may try to do, it's to compile from environment :>'chrooted' into the /compat/linux. :> :>-- :>Regards, :>Vladimir :> :> -- MfG O. Hartmann ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de ---------------------------------------------------------------- IT-Administration des Institut fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz Becherweg 21 55099 Mainz Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinensaal) Tel: +496131/3924144 FAX: +496131/3923532 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat May 19 9:29:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (fac13.ds.psu.edu [146.186.61.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C5137B422 for ; Sat, 19 May 2001 09:29:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4JGTE901415 for ; Sat, 19 May 2001 12:29:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200105191629.f4JGTE901415@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: successful installation of win98se on a thinkpad A21p (sort of) From: "Richard E. Hawkins" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 12:29:14 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It took craftiness, but I finally got it going--but I had to cheat. The win98 that comes with the machine won't execute under the vmware bios, except in safe mode. THe general win98 cd we have (not from ibm; the penn state cut) won't boot within vmware. THe first boot disk we had made hung the virtual machine when trying to load the cd driver. What I had to do was install the 2.0.4-1142.tar.gz release candidate on a linux partition, in which I'd installed a 2.4.4 kernel. (For the record, installation in FreeBSD is *much* easier than in Debian . . . go figure . . .). Within linux and with 2.0.4, I was able to boot from a duplicate of the win98 boot floppy supplied by microsoft (it wouldn't work with 2.0.3 under freebsd; simular hanging over the cd). I did the installation and installation of vmware tools under linux. Rebooting into FreeBSD, I copied the win98 directory back to the bsd home directory, and everything runs well. In fact, the sound works better than it did in linux, wherein it was choppy. hawk, moving on to networking -- Prof. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat May 19 12:32:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (fac13.ds.psu.edu [146.186.61.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC42F37B43E for ; Sat, 19 May 2001 12:32:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4JJWmg05399 for ; Sat, 19 May 2001 15:32:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200105191932.f4JJWmg05399@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: getting networking going on vmware From: "Richard E. Hawkins" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 15:32:48 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm getting ready to throw my hands up on this one and give up. The page at freebsd.org -- Prof. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat May 19 12:36: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (fac13.ds.psu.edu [146.186.61.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3566B37B424 for ; Sat, 19 May 2001 12:36:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4JJa7g06289 for ; Sat, 19 May 2001 15:36:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200105191936.f4JJa7g06289@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: ready to pull my hair out over networking under vmware From: "Richard E. Hawkins" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 15:36:07 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've run out of ideas. THe freebsdzine article suggests not using netgraph bridging, claiming that it is unnecessary. It then tells you to learn to use natd. The more I read of the natd and related man pages, the more convinced I am that using it without knowing what I'm doing will open a security hole the size of texas. The port defaults to using netgraph, and then offers no suggestion as to the correct answer as to which interface to use, and doesn't even offer a default. I've tried such things as vmnet0, vmnet1, /dev/vmnet0, /dev.vmnet1, /compat/linux/dev/vmnet0, and so forth. I've also tried ethernet and ethernet0. I note that at one point I had a /dev/vmnet1, but no 0, and not the 0-3 that occur under linux (which seem to come and go as well, but that seems normal for /compat). What in the world am I supposed to tell it? All I want is for my virtual linux and win98 boxes to be able to see the outside world, adn for my virtual linux to be able to use my X display rather than its own. hawk -- Prof. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat May 19 15:30:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mother.ludd.luth.se (mother.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41CA37B424 for ; Sat, 19 May 2001 15:30:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pantzer@ludd.luth.se) Received: from brother.ludd.luth.se (brother.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.78]) by mother.ludd.luth.se (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA27262; Sun, 20 May 2001 00:30:17 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: <200105192230.AAA27262@mother.ludd.luth.se> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Richard E. Hawkins" Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ready to pull my hair out over networking under vmware In-Reply-To: Message from "Richard E. Hawkins" of "Sat, 19 May 2001 15:36:07 EDT." <200105191936.f4JJa7g06289@fac13.ds.psu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 00:30:09 +0200 From: Mattias Pantzare Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The port defaults to using netgraph, and then offers no suggestion as > to the correct answer as to which interface to use, and doesn't even > offer a default. I've tried such things as vmnet0, vmnet1, > /dev/vmnet0, /dev.vmnet1, /compat/linux/dev/vmnet0, and so forth. > I've also tried ethernet and ethernet0. Try to give it the name for your ethernet interface. Use dmesg or ifconfig -a to find the name (vmnet1 is for vmware, le0 is the loopback interface, those are not your ethernet interface) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message