![]() |
Telelogic Modeler (steve huntington) | ![]() |


|
Topic Title: Deviation from UML Standards? Bug? User not smart enough? Topic Summary: Created On: 18-Apr-2007 11:23 Status: Read Only |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
Search Topic |
Topic Tools
|
|
|
|
|
Dear all!
Can anybody point me to a good source, where a mapping of Modeller-Rhapsody-Edition's deviations from the UML2.1 / SysML Standards is described? For example: -Modeller does not have Class- and Compositional-Structure-Diagrams. The tutorial is somewhat vague about a proper mapping. -I would like to use (abstract) data types and enumerations in a composition association (a class containing an ADT, a class containing an enumeration). For some reason I can define ADTs / enums as attributes of the class, I can however NOT draw this relationship. -I would like to see the <Object>:<Class> notation in a structure diagram. Following the procedures defined in the tutorial, this does not seem to be possible. Or are the last two point bugs in modeller? Or am I simply missing something here? Oh my! Thanks in advance for your support, regards, Marc |
|
Report this to a Moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
The Obeject Model Diagram maps to the Class Diagram.
You can create a type for a class or a package using the Add New context menu. You can use the types created for your attributes or operations. You can also drag the attributes, operations and types onto a Class Diagram (i.e OMD ) and create dependency relations between them. Do you mean the notation to create an instance of a class? |
|
Report this to a Moderator |
|
FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2009 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.