Welcome to Telelogic Product Support
  Home Downloads Knowledgebase Case Tracking Licensing Help Telelogic Passport
Telelogic Rhapsody (steve huntington)
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Unnessecerary generation of header files
Topic Summary:
Created On: 18-Oct-2006 07:36
Status: Read Only
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
Subscribe to this topic Subscribe to this topic
E-mail this topic to someone. E-mail this topic
Bookmark this topic Bookmark this topic
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 18-Oct-2006 07:36
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Jesper Gissel

Posts: 88
Joined: 20-Jul-2005

Hi,

When a modification to, for example, the body of an operation is made, Rhapsody, as expected, regenerates the implementation file. But it also regenerates the header, which is unnessecerary, since the only change was in the implementation. If the given operation was on, for example, a base class of some kind, ALL the subclasses are bound to be recompiled too, due to the "touch" of the base class header!

Does anyone know if it is possible to avoid the regenration of the header file, in the situation described above?

-------------------------
Jesper Gissel
Johnson Controls Denmark, Marine Controls
Report this to a Moderator Report this to a Moderator
Statistics
20925 users are registered to the Telelogic Rhapsody forum.
There are currently 1 users logged in.
You have posted 0 messages to this forum. 0 overall.

FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2009 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.