![]() |
Telelogic Rhapsody (steve huntington) | ![]() |
Topic Title: <<satisfy>> my curiosity Topic Summary: Created On: 4-Aug-2006 12:09 Status: Read Only |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
![]() |
![]()
|
![]() |
|
Hello
Having failed to find a definition in the UML standards (v2, on OMG website), I'm now :confused: as to why there is no mention of <<satisfy>> stereotype on dependencies, yet it is supported by Rhapsody. We think we'd like to use it but want to use it right. So I searched on Google Scholar for about an hour and found nothing either. Am I missing a trick? Can anyone cite a reference to an official definition? Thanks ![]() ------------------------- ----------------------- Matthew Thomas Panasonic Manufacturing UK Ltd |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Hi Matthew,
Just to further confuse the issue, in our work we have found it necessary to stop using <<satisfy>> but instead used <<BBSatisfy>> and <<WBSatisfy>> so that the black box and white box parts of our Harmony model can be traced. This may be something that should be taken up in the SysML definition. Oh, and the SysML specification at [url]http://www.sysml.org/[/url] does include the <<satisfy>> dependency. (Not quite an official definition, but close enough.) Charlie |
|
![]() |
Telelogic Rhapsody
» Rhapsody Category » Rhapsody
»
<<satisfy>> my curiosity
|
![]() |
FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2009 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.