Welcome to Telelogic Product Support
  Home Downloads Knowledgebase Case Tracking Licensing Help Telelogic Passport
Telelogic Rhapsody (steve huntington)
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: <<satisfy>> my curiosity
Topic Summary:
Created On: 4-Aug-2006 12:09
Status: Read Only
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
Subscribe to this topic Subscribe to this topic
E-mail this topic to someone. E-mail this topic
Bookmark this topic Bookmark this topic
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 4-Aug-2006 12:09
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Matthew Thomas

Posts: 35
Joined: 18-Jun-2007

Hello

Having failed to find a definition in the UML standards (v2, on OMG website), I'm now :confused: as to why there is no mention of <<satisfy>> stereotype on dependencies, yet it is supported by Rhapsody. We think we'd like to use it but want to use it right. So I searched on Google Scholar for about an hour and found nothing either. Am I missing a trick?

Can anyone cite a reference to an official definition?

Thanks

-------------------------
-----------------------
Matthew Thomas
Panasonic Manufacturing UK Ltd
Report this to a Moderator Report this to a Moderator
 7-Aug-2006 14:00
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Charlie Lane

Posts: 86
Joined: 16-Sep-2005

Hi Matthew,

Just to further confuse the issue, in our work we have found it necessary to stop using <<satisfy>> but instead used <<BBSatisfy>> and <<WBSatisfy>> so that the black box and white box parts of our Harmony model can be traced. This may be something that should be taken up in the SysML definition.

Oh, and the SysML specification at [url]http://www.sysml.org/[/url] does include the <<satisfy>> dependency. (Not quite an official definition, but close enough.)

Charlie
Report this to a Moderator Report this to a Moderator
Statistics
20925 users are registered to the Telelogic Rhapsody forum.
There are currently 1 users logged in.
You have posted 0 messages to this forum. 0 overall.

FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2009 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.