![]() |
Telelogic Rhapsody (steve huntington) | ![]() |
Topic Title: Unnessecerary generation of header files Topic Summary: Created On: 18-Oct-2006 07:36 Status: Read Only |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
![]() |
![]()
|
![]() |
|
Hi,
When a modification to, for example, the body of an operation is made, Rhapsody, as expected, regenerates the implementation file. But it also regenerates the header, which is unnessecerary, since the only change was in the implementation. If the given operation was on, for example, a base class of some kind, ALL the subclasses are bound to be recompiled too, due to the "touch" of the base class header! ![]() Does anyone know if it is possible to avoid the regenration of the header file, in the situation described above? ------------------------- Jesper Gissel Johnson Controls Denmark, Marine Controls |
|
![]() |
Telelogic Rhapsody
» Rhapsody Category » Rhapsody
»
Unnessecerary generation of header files
|
![]() |
FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2009 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.