![]() |
Telelogic System Architect (steve huntington) | ![]() |
Topic Title: Poll: What is a reasonable expectation for the number of encyclopaedia? Topic Summary: Beginning to establish the environment and want to find out what is a good starting point... Created On: 23-Mar-2007 10:40 Status: Read Only |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
![]() |
![]()
|
![]() |
|
We are refreshing the SA environment we have and are trying to set some expectations as to the encyclopaedia structure and numbers we should have. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Bump...
Come along, don't be shy, how many encyclopaedia do you have??
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
For us we only use one.
I'm the primary user with a handful of other occasional users. Total person's involved in development is about 30. Plus, I stress integration between our different projects so one encyclopedia works best for us. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
The goal has always been one but that can be impractical.
Started off with an separate encyclopedias for each project. Projects start and some projects just wither way. The problem has always been how to supply and keep up to date a standard starting point and what goes into that. At present location, a recently new user, only got three encyclopedias, one to carry out the actual work in, another to copy the approved work to and publish from and third one for users to play/practice on. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
It really depends on what modelling artifacts you are creating and the nature of your application architecture.
My best answer is "as few as you can get away with". I wouldn't try and mix as-is and to-be architectures in the same encyclopaedia but apart from that you have to be pragmatic. I don't like individual project encyclopaedia but they do prevent developers from changing the corporate architecture to suit themselves. |
|
![]() |
FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2009 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.